Why dreaming of death is not necessarily a negative sign


Dreams of death are common, both in adults and in children, in men and in women. And if it can be scary, it is not necessarily a bad sign! Discover the meaning of the dream of death according to Freudian and Jungian interpretations among others.

Interpretation of the dream of death according to Nostradamus

  • To see a dead man crowned is an omen of illness.
  • Having the dream of being dead or seeing one’s death is a sign of imminent luck and if the dreamer is resurrected, it is even better it augurs well, of honor and bliss.
  • Dreaming of the death of a friend announces the reunion of a protective friend.
  • The dream of an animal dying on the road brings relief from some worries.
  • To be at the table with an unknown dead person and to eat with him in a dream is a sign of great near prestige.

Interpretation of Artemidore’s dream of death

For Artémidore the dreamer who sees the dead in a dream without speaking to them will have joy and fortune, but if a dead man steals the clothes, the money or even the dishes of the dreamer, then it is a fatal dream.

Giving money or clothes to someone who died in a dream is an omen of great unhappiness or serious illness.

There are scenarios and variants of the dream of death. Death in a dream can come in various forms: death of a loved one, illness, death directly from oneself or from someone else … In other words, more than a dream, it is more about a nightmare!

If it is very rare to dream of your own death, because the unconscious has a lot of trouble imagining it, dreaming moments before your death or the death of one of your loved ones remains frequent.

There are different variants that allow you to better analyze your dreams thanks to symbolism: dreaming of finding a skeleton, being chased in a cemetery, drowning, seeing someone being crucified, finding a decomposing body, to be buried or burned dead or alive, to be killed, to commit suicide, etc. And each of these variants can complete the analysis of his dream.

Jungian interpretation of the dream of death

Associated with the mystery of the afterlife and the unknown, the dream of death does not mean that we are going to die or that one of our loved ones is going to die. It rather reflects the emergence of a renewal in life, from the passage of an ordeal to reach a higher level of self-fulfillment.

According to Jung, such a dream often occurs during transition periods and shows the desire to move on. He considers that through the death of the body, the dreamer aspires to the immortality of the soul.

Dreaming of death would therefore be relatively positive and would testify to the disappearance of obstacles to make way for a more harmonious lifestyle. Contrary to all that one could think, one realizes by following the rules to interpret his dreams that it is a positive dream, a dream translating more lucidity and surpassing oneself in what concerns the dreamer. In this case, the dream of death attests to the dreamer’s desire to live.

Freudian interpretation of the dream of death

For Freud experts, the dream of death is interpreted quite differently since it shows a need to escape from one’s sexual impulses.

It is the sign of an internal conflict between the desire to fulfil one’s frustrations and the need to respect the order established by society. Dreaming of death, like many things we don’t know about dreams, actually has nothing to do with physical death.

The dreamer would therefore find himself faced with the choice of accepting his impulses or burying them forever. Death then appears in the dream as the ultimate punishment for not having managed to assume its frustrations and results in the guilt of the dreamer.

1.7 Million Children Die Each Year from Pollution


The World Health Organization estimates that 1.7 million children under the age of 5 die each year from environmental pollution.

The pollution of our planet does not only have an impact on the environment, it also obviously affects humans and especially children. This is what this recent statement from the World Health Organization (WHO) says, stressing that 1.7 million children under the age of 5 die each year from pollution.

There are many causes. The WHO estimates that 570,000 children die each year from infections linked to the respiratory system, which are directly linked to indoor and outdoor pollution, as well as passive smoking. 361,000 children die before the age of 5 due to illnesses linked to diarrhea, contracted due to poor access to clean water and, in fact, good hygiene. The remaining 600,000 deaths, detailed by WHO, include problems linked to water and air pollution, but also to diseases directly linked to the environment, such as malaria.

Between 11 and 14% of Children Have Asthma

Margaret Chan, WHO Director-General, explains that a polluted environment is deadly, especially for young children. Their developing organs, immune systems, bodies and smaller airways make them much more vulnerable to pollution and polluted water. WHO also highlights the negative consequences of these problems, which have a real impact on the growth of children around the world.

In fact between 11% and 14% of children suffer from asthma, 44% of these cases are linked to pollution. Without forgetting the chemicals present in food, such as pesticides composed of fluoride, lead and mercury, and other toxic substances, like paints containing lead. The growing increase in electronic waste is also alarming WHO.

Invest in a Greener World

Maria Neira, director of the WHO Department of Public Health said that a polluted environment has a very negative impact on the health of our children. Investing in the elimination of environmental risks, by improving water quality or using less polluting fuels, will bring huge health benefits. The world needs better better waste management solutions in order to combat that rampant pollution problem.

The solutions presented by the organization aim to renew urban environments with the improvement of public structures such as hospitals and schools, the increase of green areas and public transport in cities, as well as the phase out of pesticides and chemicals in several household cleaning products.

Can algorithms help fight noise pollution

You will have to train them first.

Scientists want to reduce noise pollution by using algorithms. Through a network involving computers and citizens, they want to identify the sounds that accumulate in New York.

Air conditioning, car horn, street music, sirens: what if we taught computers to recognize the different sounds of noise pollution? This is the objective pursued by Sonyc in New York, a project carried out by a group of scientists.

Their work, presented in the journal Communications of the ACM in February 2019, is based on the use of sensors and a machine listening system. It consists of training algorithms to recognize the sounds of New York City in real time.

A Network of Acoustic Sensors

The tool must therefore be trained to describe precisely what is the origin of the noises that pollute the sound environment of New Yorkers. The sounds will be recorded by the acoustic sensors, which are manufactured using Raspberry Pi nanocomputers and microphones. Each unit costs around 80 dollars to produce.

The inventors of Sonyc also want citizens to participate in the process, by passing noise deemed undesirable to an application (which has not yet been developed). Its users will be able to view data annotated by other people. One of the objectives would also be to be able to alert the authorities through the app.

The result of all these observations could then be presented to the competent authorities, in order to better identify the urban areas subject to certain types of noise pollution, a road axis regularly congested, for example. For the time being, the creators of this system have yet to deploy and test it in real conditions. They hope the results will allow Sonyc to be used across the United States.

And humans are not the only ones to suffer from noise pollution: some animals must adapt as well to continue living in the city.

8 Tips To Naturally Relieve Back Pain


It is estimated that there are 30 million people in a given time experiencing and struggle with back pain. Dubbed as the single leading cause of disability by the Global Burden Disease, back pain is usually treated temporarily using prescription pills.

Though it provides instant relief, painkillers such as this can cause ranging effects from stomach ulcers to painkiller addiction. If you want to naturally treat your back pain, here are a couple of tips and tricks that will save your life and your wallet.

Acupuncture

This traditional Chinese method of treatment is designed to improve your “Qi”; also known as your energy or life force. An acupuncturist will know the right points to target as they follow the meridian theory – that is a body contains 2000 focal points that are interconnected by meridians.

They will use hollow and pointed needles to correct the imbalance of your “Qi” and to relieve pain.

Cold/Hot Compress

If the pain is associated with spasms, it can get quite painful. Once spasms occur, a gush of white blood cells are sent to the spastic area and red blood cells start to deplete. This will temporarily block the are from the oxygen and nutrients in needs – which causes more pain and injury.

An alternative cold and hot compress will relieve the pain and the spasms. As soon as you feel that the spasms are starting, immediately apply cold compress on the area, alternating it for 20 minutes with compress and 20 minutes without the compress.

You must do this within 24 to 72 hours. You can start slow stretching alleviate tightness and increase circulation. Afterwards, you can add heat. The heat will help promote the healing process. Just as the cold compress, you need to do an on-and-off procedure for an interval of 20 minutes. You can do this process until you feel relieved.

Seek A Chiropractor

A chiropractor is a specialist who can assist you with pain management too. If your back pain is caused by a previous injury, it is very likely that there is pressure on your spine and nerves. This prevents proper communication with the nerves thereby causing pain and discomfort. In a case like this, a simple adjustment from a chiropractor would be a great help.

Natural Supplements

Using natural supplements to treat and relieve back pain is very common. There are products that can help lessen the pain and inflammation. Some of them can also help strengthen your bones. It all depends on what exactly you need. Looking for the right supplement that works for you will also take some time. Be patient if you want to go in this route.

One example of such a product is the EarthWell Turmeric Curcumin Extract Anti-inflammatory Supplement. It is based on turmeric curcumin, which is known to be one of the strongest natural antioxidants for pain relief. It also contains bioperine which is used for faster effect.

Weight Loss

It’s also possible that excess weight has contributed to your back pain. This weight usually drags the spine, pulling it in a more anterior-arched position. A good workout that can strengthen your core can provide a long-lasting relief for back pain.

Back Support

Sometimes, a back pain would come from improper seating position. If you sit on an uncomfortable chair for long periods of time, you can add some back support by using a foam pillow. You can also add cushions at your back to give you proper posture when sitting down.

Stretching Exercises

Stretching exercises can help you strengthen your lumbar muscles which will help support your weight better. This will also lengthen your back muscles thus alleviating the pain you’re feeling.

Yoga

Attending yoga classes is not only good for meditating but good for your flexibility and strength. This exercise focuses more on the connectedness of your body. Yoga can help increase flexibility, blood circulation and gives you a sense of well-being. You can let your yoga instructor know about your muscle pain so that he or she can teach you tricks that can ease your back pain.

What Causes Obesity and How To Treat It


It’s easy to see what are the causes of obesity on the surface; consuming more than what you can burn through physical exertion and activity will lead to weight gain and/or obesity. Though this is true, it may not be the entire case.

Each and every one of us are different – from the way we look, move, speak and act. Even our preference with food is different. These all are stemming from our genetic make up. And the risk factors that cause obesity can be a combination of genes, lifestyle choices and metabolic factors. Health conditions can also contribute to weight gain.

Genes

Is your mom and dad fit? Is one of them obese? Studies say that “fat genes” are real. You can inherit obesity from your parents if one of them is overweight or obese. If one or both of your parents is obese, you are 25% more likely to become obese yourself.

The areas where you carry weight depend on your heredity as well. If one of your parents carry the weight in the middle or hips area, you are most likely to get that too.

Choices in Lifestyle

If you are living a very sedentary lifestyle, even if you’re eating healthily, you are most likely to still gain some weight. Making sure that you burn more than what you eat will help you stay fit. Life choices is an extremely important factor when it comes to preventing or treating obesity.

If you prefer sugary, high in fat, refined foods, chances are you’ll still gain the pounds. As people prefer to eat-and-go, more people tend to choose fast food. This is not the kind of lifestyle you should take. A balanced diet and controlled portions should be your choice.

Metabolic System and Hormones

The calories from the food we eat becomes the energy we use to fuel our bodies. Though all of us use calories as the basic energy unit, we all metabolize differently. This means, the way you expend energy may not be the same as your sister’s. Metabolic rate is different for everyone. However, it also plays a vital role in determining your weight.

This is also the same with hunger. Hunger can also be triggered by hormones – even though you just ate 30 minutes ago. Hunger and appetite is dependent on how much ghrelin is released in your body. Hormones also play a part in the feeling of fullness.

Treating Obesity For Adults

Setting a goal is the important part in treating obesity. While some people may want to lose weight due to fashion, societal or vanity reasons, it is a must that losing as little as 10% of your current body weight will have a huge improvement in your health. The positive effects of losing as little as 10 pounds will alleviate some stress on your organs. No two people are alike.

A weight loss plan for you may not work for the other. Stick to a plan that works for you. The best method in losing the weight is to take it slowly. Often times, quick loss will spur up weight gain as soon as you slow down. Planning for a 2 lbs loss per week is more preferable. If you keep this course for the next 3 years, you’ll lose around 70 lbs for good.

In the end, it is the life choices that you make that will matter. Obesity is not easy to treat, as obesity can also affect your mentality and emotions. As mentioned, setting a goal is very important, but staying on the goal is the key to a successful weight loss. If you are an individual who is suffering with obesity, check with your physician on options that you can take to become better.

Agriculture and greenhouse effect


Agriculture is both one of the sectors most vulnerable to the impacts of climate change and a net contributor to anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases. With 15% of global emissions, agriculture rejects methane from livestock and land, nitrous oxide from fertilization with nitrogen and manure management and carbon dioxide from energy consumption.

The impact of agriculture

According to its impact on agricultural lands and practices, agriculture can also be used to capture CO2 from the atmosphere and thus mitigate climate change, but it can also contribute to global warming, for example by causing deforestation.

If emissions from agricultural sources are declining in most industrialized countries, the globalization of trade and population growth partly explain the sharp increase in agricultural emissions in developing countries.

Similarly, if methane (livestock, waste management and rice cultivation) is the main gas emitted in the South, it is nitrous oxide (use of fertilizers and manure management) which tops agricultural emissions in the North.

However, it is important to note that due to the complexity and variability of agricultural systems, uncertainties remain regarding the assessment of these emissions, necessitating a research effort in this area.

All agriculture production except the ones for organic cultivation use fertilizers and synthetic pesticides, which must be produced, and this requires fossil fuels, thus generates CO2 emissions (synthetic fertilizers are produced from natural gas). So when you eat carrots or apples, or when you drink coffee or orange juice, remember that this contributes to the global warning effect. Not just driving your car.

If we reason to the hectare, synthetic fertilizers are mainly upstream emissions, pesticides are much more marginal emissions for greenhouse gas emissions. Moreover, intermediate chemical reactions in the fertilizer production also generate some N2O.

Economics behind it

Of course the emissions associated with the manufacture of these products are not counted under agriculture, but under “industry”. Expenditure for the purchase of raw products such as vegetables or fresh fruit in bulk, or fresh meat, represent only about 20% of all of what we spend on food on average.

The rest of our spending is devoted to production of processed food like pasta, canned and frozen foods, ready meals, biscuits and sweets, drinks,… These industries consume energy directly, and therefore emit greenhouse gases as well that will be included in the products we buy, with about 15% of the energy industry in developed countries made by the food industry. Next these products are usually packed.

It turns out that the manufacture of packaging represents a significant fraction of base material that we produce such as aluminum and plastics. Basic materials production is responsible for 70% to 80% of emissions from the industry, with a part of the package that will be used at the supermarket.

Solutions exist to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases in agriculture: optimizing of the use of nitrogen fertilizers, better waste management to producing energy from waste, development of simplified cultivation techniques but also in some cases deployment of energy efficiency and use of renewable energy.

The future of agriculture

Today it is not possible to make a precise comparison between farming systems (organic, rational, conventional) from the standpoint of only gas emissions. This is partly due to many uncertainties, but also to the lack of accurate data on the full gas balance of different systems, both because of their their diversity and complexity.

However, it is clear that agriculture in the 21st century will have to answer a series of environmental, social and economic challenges involving a fundamental change in practice, notably to meet the need of mitigation of gas emissions and the preservation and ecosystem restoration.

The international community is committed to maintain global warming to below a 2 degrees Celcius increase. This implies a division by at least 2 of global emissions by 2050 and a reduction by a factor of 4-5 in the industrialized countries. In this sense Europe has committed to at least a 20% reduction of greenhouse gas emissions by 2020. These objectives defined at the international level require the mobilization of all sectors, including agriculture, which will have to undergo a profound change to meet the climate challenge.

The adaptation of agriculture and forestry systems to this new climate situation as well as the effects on diseases, pests and weeds require new skills in agronomic and forestry: development of new varieties, development of cultivation techniques adapted or forestry, etc. This adaptation also leads us to consider the geographic mobility of production areas.

Migration of cropping or forest species to enhance adaptation, new agroclimatic potential and forestry, biotech opportunities in connection with the economic determinants, and more generally the future direction of the duties of the agricultural and forestry production.